It's the easiest babysitting hack known to modern adults attempting to pacify a fussy baby: Take a smartphone, find a game or show, put it in the childs hands, andlo and behold! The kid is quiet, eyes wide, and still.
And that magic trick seems to extend to children who can crawl, tots who are just stringing together words, kids toddling into preschool, andmost obviously, at least when it comes to psychological researchtweens and teens hunched over their smartphones, oblivious to the world.
That worries a group of Apple investors, who are calling on the company to investigate what effects this screen time has on childrens brains and development. In a letter co-signed by New York investment firm JANA Partners and Anne Sheehan, the director of corporate governance at the California State Teachers Retirement System (the largest public teachers pension fund in the country), the investors implore the tech giant to fund research into what their ubiquitous products might do to a childs brain:
The average American teenager who uses a smart phone receives her first phone at age 10 and spends over 4.5 hours a day on it (excluding texting and talking). 78% of teens check their phones at least hourly and 50% report feeling addicted to their phones. It would defy common sense to argue that this level of usage, by children whose brains are still developing, is not having at least some impact, or that the maker of such a powerful product has no role to play in helping parents to ensure it is being used optimally. It is also no secret that social media sites and applications for which the iPhone and iPad are a primary gateway are usually designed to be as addictive and time-consuming as possible, as many of their original creators have publicly acknowledged.
The letter is signed on behalf of investors whose shares amount to nearly $2 billion of Apple stock. Apples total valuation is about $900 billion.
Its a small proportion, but the letter is sparking conversation about what it means to be addicted to technologyparticularly among the youngest users of smart technology. It cites research and science published within childhood psychology, including that of Jean Twenge, a professor of psychology at San Diego State University whose most recent book, iGen: Why Todays Superconnected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happyand Completely Unprepared for Adulthood, tackles the effects of smartphones on teens.
Twenge said she first spotted some odd trends in teenage mental health in 2011 and 2012, when smartphones were becoming more common among teens. There was a doubling in the suicide rate and tripling in emergency room admissions of self-harm among young girls, Twenge said. And there was a 50 percent increase in the clinical depression rate.
To Twenge, the link between screen time and mental health seemed apparent. And while she said her research doesnt touch on addiction so much as the mental health of teens based on smartphone use, she said theres undeniable proof that screen time has a negative effect on developing minds, based on research that was published in November in the journal Clinical Psychological Science.
I found that teens who spend five or more hours a day of screen time are 71 percent more likely to have risk factors for mental health issues, such as depression, or thinking about suicide. That screen time is measured as that devoted to gaming, social media, or any other use of a device outside homework. And while Twenges research doesnt indicate causation, other research does show that screen time leads to unhappiness rather than the other way around.
Thats because there are some very significant neurological events happening when we interact with our screen. Anna Lembke is an assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the Stanford University Medical Center, and shes studied addiction extensively, both substance abuse and technology. She said the way we absorb the cool blue glow of a screen is akin to the electricity a drug user may feel.
Smartphone screens light up the same area of the brain as opioids and cannabis, she told The Daily Beast. The rewards pathways mediated by dopamine respond to screens in a very similar way to opioids.
What makes adolescents especially vulnerable to the addictive nature of smartphones is that they are in a crucially pliable point of their mental and physical growth. Theyre incredibly socially sensitive, Lembke said of adolescents, classed as those first experiencing puberty through those at the end of the teenage years.
The need to fit in and the desire to be popular and gain social points mean that kids this age are especially vulnerable to falling for the social media contagion effect, the term Lembke uses to describe a child doing something just because a peer is doing it. And Lembke said that reasoning is simply logical in an adolescents brain.
Adolescent brains are more vulnerable to risk taking, so the emotion centers of the brain drive behavior more than the future planning centers of the brain, she saidwhich is why teens are impulsive enough to take risks without recognizing future consequences. Their brains are pliable because adolescence is a time when neurons undergo pruning, fundamentally altering the shape and structure of the brain from one of a childs into that of an adults.
Online, that can be dangerous: It can lead to slut shaming when kids send and receive nude photos without thinking about ramifications, for example, or bullying on anonymous messaging apps like last summers sleeper hit Sarahah. Being turned on by peers can be devastating for a teen and in some extreme, tragic cases lead to suicide. Neuronal pruning can mean screens are used as a coping strategy, and tearing kids away from their screen can be difficult not only because it offers a sense of safety and information, but also because a kid may be addicted.
But what about little kids? After all, infants and toddlers arent using the internet to stalk their exes or dissect the latest cryptic Taylor Swift tweet. Theyre primarily using it as an entertainment device replacing, at the most high-tech end, a television show with squealy puppets, and at the low-tech end, a parent regaling a child with tales.
Thats part of the reason why judging the effects of touch screenssmartphones, tablets, and their ilkis so difficult: the fact that theyre new. The iPhone just celebrated its 10th birthday, so theres not much history for figuring out how the smartphone may have changed how we think. And what makes all this even more difficult is trying to figure out when exactly tech addiction could kick in.
Nearly all the research that is relevant is mostly with much older kids, Heather Kirkorian, an associate professor at the School of Human Ecology at the University of Wisconsin who studies how toddlers under 5 learn with media, told The Daily Beast. But theres not much scientific consensus.
Kirkorian has found (using data from Common Sense Media) that kids time with technology goes up as they age, with preschool kiddos clocking in an hour-and-a-half per day. Kirkorian said her research focuses on learning with technologynot problematic useand said that while she sees some expected demographic trends of boys playing video games more than girls, who tend to favor social media, and white children eking out more screen time than their black and Hispanic counterparts, tech is not necessarily all bad.
Tech can play a positive role in the lives of kids, Kirkorian said, citing the ability to video chat with family who live far away and playing interactive games under the supervision of older family members as valuable for bonding and learning.
What Kirkorian wishes the Apple investors letter addressed was the fact that while weve started to collect a fair amount of data on how kids interact with technology, we still dont quite understand how to interpret those findings.
Kirkorian points to the example of teens who might be suffering from depression and anxiety. The causal direction is not clear, she pointed out. It could be that this is actually a tool for teens who are disconnected and lack social interaction. They can be tools to help kids who are socially isolated.
But are these kids reaching for tech to ease feelings of isolation, or are they isolated because theyre entering their digital worlds? Thats really unclear, and its the chicken and egg problem here, Kirkorian said.
Lembke said the screen, however, is inherently addictive, regardless of intent. Even if I turn to a screen because Im anxious, to cope with my anxiety, that screen can become inherently addictive, she said. You can become addicted." Lembke said shes had patients come in with substance problems who didnt initially mean to become reliant on a substance.
For those who are vulnerable to addiction, the risks are extraordinarily high, she said. Add to that early onset of use, and the risk of addiction is there.
Adam Alter, an associate professor of marketing at New York University and author of last years Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked, told The Daily Beast via email that the question isnt about whether too much screen time leads to a tech addiction among kids.
Ive used the word addiction myself, but whether or not you use the word to describe how children interact with screens is beside the point, he said. When you ask how young a person can be to be addicted, I think the real question is how young can a person be to be adversely affected by a smartphone.
And for that, Alter doesnt think theres an age when screen time is safe. Theres no lower limit in my opinion, he said. As soon as a child can sit in front of a screenand as soon as that screen eats into the time he or she might spend in face-to-face interactions with other people or engaging with the wider worldits possible for the phone to compromise that childs well-being. To Alter, its up to the caretaker to figure out when kids are distracted, unhappy, disengaged, and generally adversely affected by screens.
But thats what makes declaring technology as a villain difficult and problematic: It can serve an important role as a teacher and motivator. Every expert The Daily Beast interviewed had a different thought about what the best solution should be about youth tech addiction. What was universally agreed upon, however, was that the Apple letter shone an important light on tech addiction among kids. Thus far, screen time has been regulated, with a 2015 report breaking the concept of limiting time for kids, going so far as to suggest that the phrase screen time was antiquated.
Exposure to the internet isnt actually the problem. Being online can be good for kids of all ages. Whats problematic, as psychologists point out, is relying on the screen to come to terms with the roller coaster emotional experience of being a teen and not being able to turn to another peer or activity without feeling pain of being torn away from a device. As the letter stated: To be clear, we are not advocating an all or nothing approach. While expert opinions vary on this issue, there appears to be a developing consensus that the goal for parents should be ensuring the developmentally optimal amount and type of access, particularly given the educational benefits mobile devices can offer.
In other words: iPhones, iPads, and any other digital device kids might veer toward for entertainment arent bad. Theyre amazing tools for learning and growth. They simply arent the only tools a kid should have to explore the world.